On
Friday, April 13, North Korea attempted to launch some satellite-rocket against
the word of the rest of the world.
Although it failed, Barack Obama has decided that the U.S. may need to
engage the issue. He explains
that, “…they made a decision that they have to live with…We can’t keep trying
to help them help themselves.” Hilary Clinton has been attempting to gather N.
Korea for talks but explains that each time anyone tries to intervene with
their affairs, their behavior only gets worse. All in all, after violating two
Security Council resolutions, the U.S. is pushing for tough condemnation of
North Korea.
With
all other countries against the launch of this satellite and the North Korea
launching regardless, another instance of necessary
containment seems to be at hand here.
In another blog article by CNN, it is stated that this attempted launch
is a clear signal that N. Korea may be on the verge of an underground nuclear
testing, threatening many nations of the world. Obama rightfully so sees that allowing North Korea to
continue with such misbehavior will only encourage the same until North Korea
becomes a clear and present danger to what peace currently exists.
If
there is no containment of North Korea by the U.S. or the rest of the U.N.,
then the safety of the people is at stake. As we mentioned in class recently, containment culture has
received a horrible name from its Cold War beginnings. In many situations, it absolutely deserves that name. But in some drastic scenarios,
containment must be employed for the greater good. In this instance – albeit at worst – the lack of U.S.
control over North Korea could cause a threat that builds into nuclear
war. Once this happens, then the
bad-name containment can be expected to most definitely make a return, as war
time containment is much more propagandistic and deft towards the people taking
it in.
It’s
ironic that I myself am taking sides with the U.S. in their world super power
actions, seeing as I generally find our country’s intervention over the line
and sometimes for the wrong reason.
Let it be known that I am not the most knowledgeable person of
international news either. This
makes me wonder whether or not North Korea is even a threat at all. Are
they actually attempting to conquer the world? All the accounts within the CNN blog are from U.S. officials
and there’s been no opportunity to get an account of what North Korea has
perceived of us (Is North Korea being difficult, or is our government not
hearing them out?). From the way
these few articles are written and framed, it does seem that way. It does seem strange however, that I
myself have seemed to miss any word on the fact that this was in progress at
all. If it is such a possibly
dangerous ordeal, I feel it should have held more chatter around this campus
(which is the only way I – who reads no blogs or news, who watches no
television – would hear of such a thing).
To
sum it up, if we are being told the total truth, then the containment of North
Korea must be called for. However, if we are missing some pieces of the story,
then perhaps we have some questions to ask ourselves, here on the home front.
-Jon McAllister
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/13/u-s-could-shift-to-containment-strategy-for-north-korea/
I definitely think that if since North Korea could potentially be risking the lives of the citizens of other nations, then some sort of containment should be done in this instance. In the sense that lives could pointlessly be lost (and not just within their own nation) because they want to engage in nuclear testing, launching faulty rockets and not listen to international laws is something we should probably not let be. Granted I would want to see evidence, if possible, of North Korea's intends to perform and undergo more reckless experiments, but also I sort of don't want to risk it either. Where do we draw the line for truly justifying containing another country?
ReplyDeleteThis is the type of thing that I just stay out of. Foreign affairs, mostly politics in general. Not a fan, and I don't trust the government when I read into things like this, so I'd rather just be blindly acceptant of governmental action. It seems to be the only way to thrive and not tarry..
ReplyDeleteI also don't keep up on too many foreign affairs. I only hear about something like this if it's discussed in class or among friends; however, it is an interesting topic. It makes me nervous that we could enter another Cold War, but then again will more containment put a stop to that? And also, how will the U.S. be viewed on an international level if we were to go against the U.N. again?
ReplyDeleteIt's definitely no black and white thing. You can stay out of it and hope for the best, but then you have the chance of risking peoples' lives. It takes a conspiracy theorist to say the government has some sort of secret reason for beating up North Korea, and a person who will follow the government blind to say containment is necessary and valid here. All I know is: I'm too damn apathetic and ignorant to care...(although I really should)
ReplyDelete